Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs RYCFX
FBTAX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. RYCFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and RYCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. RYCFX (88.7M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FBTAX (2.74) vs RYCFX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FBTAX (25 years) vs RYCFX (24 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FBTAX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.79 vs. RYCFX (-19.34). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.58 vs. RYCFX (-37.97).
| FBTAX | RYCFX | FBTAX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.40 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.364 | 7.806 | 133% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 88.7M | 1,577% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.79 | -19.34 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.33 | -13.51 | -165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.58 | -37.97 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.97 | -48.60 | -10% |