Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs RYCFX
FBTAX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. RYCFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and RYCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. RYCFX (93.7M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FBTAX (1.02) vs RYCFX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FBTAX (24 years) vs RYCFX (24 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RYCFX (61.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FBTAX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.60 vs. RYCFX (-14.76). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.41 vs. RYCFX (-30.04).
| FBTAX | RYCFX | FBTAX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.772 | 4.531 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 93.7M | 1,660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | -14.76 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.57 | -16.58 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.41 | -30.04 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.06 | -43.30 | -21% |