Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs RYCFX
FBTAX vs RYCFX Comparison
Open Charts FBTAX vs RYCFX
FBTAX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. RYCFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and RYCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 2.43B vs. RYCFX (131M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FBTAX (0.91) vs RYCFX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FBTAX (26 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FBTAX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.19 vs. RYCFX (19.59). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.72 vs. RYCFX (-31.57).
| FBTAX | RYCFX | FBTAX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.38 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.410 | 25.058 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 131M | 1,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.19 | 19.59 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.96 | 15.54 | 708% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.72 | -31.57 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.02 | -15.46 | -977% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement