Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. FBTCX (1.3B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (2.88) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX (-9.83) and FSPHX (-10.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.33 vs. FBTCX (-23.85).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.702 | -5.651 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 5.92B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 0.02 | 16,278% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.83 | -10.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | -0.45 | -4,930% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.85 | -15.33 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.58 | 8.71 | -259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement