Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FBTCX (1.74B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (2.12) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.88 vs. FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.31 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.915 | 10.532 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 6.22B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 0.02 | 13,366% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.88 | 0.02 | 176,779% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.76 | 10.47 | 561% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.31 | -8.84 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.17 | 39.34 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement