Ad is loading...
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FBTCX (1.39B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (2.90) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. FBTCX (-16.13). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -7.06 vs. FBTCX (-21.40).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.65 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.65 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.191 | -5.798 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 6.42B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 0.02 | 17,328% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.13 | -8.31 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.07 | -9.31 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.40 | -7.06 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.49 | 8.14 | -350% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers