Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. FBTCX (1.61B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (2.29) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.86 vs. FSPHX (-10.39). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.51 vs. FSPHX (-13.76).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.398 | 3.376 | 693% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 5.96B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.02 | 13,753% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | -10.39 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.43 | 7.09 | 641% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.51 | -13.76 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.16 | 36.17 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement