Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. FBTCX (1.46B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (2.53) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.14 vs. FSPHX (-16.94). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : -8.90 vs. FSPHX (-15.10).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.672 | -2.385 | -531% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 5.88B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 0.02 | 14,767% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.14 | -16.94 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.32 | -2.44 | -1,119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.90 | -15.10 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.77 | 17.50 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement