Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. FBTCX (1.28B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (2.98) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.29 vs. FSPHX (-12.67). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.93 vs. FBTCX (-19.67).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.129 | -7.266 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 5.86B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 0.02 | 16,432% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.29 | -12.67 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.26 | -1.50 | -1,747% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.67 | -13.93 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.76 | 8.04 | -246% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement