Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. FBTCX (2.2B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (1.10) vs FSPHX (0.41). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (26 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTCX (51.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.72 vs. FSPHX (10.22). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.64 vs. FSPHX (-14.87).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.62 | 276% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.62 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.685 | -1.326 | -1,786% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 6.37B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.41 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.72 | 10.22 | 692% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.81 | 0.21 | 44,132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.64 | -14.87 | -253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.87 | 41.70 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement