Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. FBTCX (1.9B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (1.28) vs FSPHX (0.45). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTCX (51.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.82 vs. FSPHX (-2.88). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.27 vs. FSPHX (-23.32).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.985 | -14.447 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 5.78B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.45 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.82 | -2.88 | -1,698% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | -14.19 | -387% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.27 | -23.32 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.63 | 24.79 | 257% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers