Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. FBTCX (2.43B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (1.03) vs FSPHX (0.39). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (26 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTCX (51.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.42 vs. FSPHX (6.37). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.60 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.62 | 276% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.62 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.621 | 1.524 | 1,813% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 6.75B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.39 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.42 | 6.37 | 823% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.22 | 4.93 | 1,993% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.60 | -15.45 | -217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.09 | 46.10 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement