Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. FBTCX (2.2B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (1.11) vs FSPHX (0.42). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (26 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTCX (51.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 69.14 vs. FSPHX (14.59). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.61 vs. FSPHX (-10.56).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.62 | 276% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.62 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.169 | 5.675 | 602% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 6.3B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.42 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 69.14 | 14.59 | 474% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.81 | 10.34 | 1,062% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.61 | -10.56 | -432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.76 | 46.08 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement