Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs PRHSX
FBTCX vs PRHSX Comparison
Open Charts FBTCX vs PRHSX
FBTCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Hold and PRHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FBTCX (2.2B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FBTCX (1.11) vs PRHSX (0.11). FBTCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FBTCX (26 years) vs PRHSX (31 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRHSX (0.83). PRHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.60 vs. FBTCX (51.00). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FBTCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.48 vs. PRHSX (17.78). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.93 vs. PRHSX (-18.71).
| FBTCX | PRHSX | FBTCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.83 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.83 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.132 | 7.338 | 274% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 11.9B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.11 | 1,033% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.48 | 17.78 | 340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.25 | -0.28 | -30,052% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.93 | -18.71 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.38 | 35.99 | 248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers