Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs FSPHX
FBTDX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTDX vs FSPHX
FBTDX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. FBTDX (1.2B). FBTDX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTDX (1.35) vs FSPHX (0.39). FBTDX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTDX (13 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTDX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTDX (37.62). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBTDX: FSPHX (0) vs FBTDX (1000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.29 vs. FSPHX (6.37). FBTDX return over 5 years is better than : 18.25 vs. FSPHX (-15.45).
| FBTDX | FSPHX | FBTDX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.62 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.62 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.920 | 1.524 | 1,176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 6.75B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.39 | 345% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.29 | 6.37 | 616% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.06 | 4.93 | 1,422% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.25 | -15.45 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.06 | 46.10 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement