Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs FSPHX
FBTDX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTDX vs FSPHX
FBTDX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. FBTDX (1.08B). FBTDX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTDX (1.51) vs FSPHX (0.45). FBTDX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTDX (12 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTDX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBTDX: FSPHX (0) vs FBTDX (1000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.31 vs. FSPHX (0.76). FBTDX return over 5 years is better than : 5.87 vs. FSPHX (-23.99).
| FBTDX | FSPHX | FBTDX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.62 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.62 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.428 | -11.527 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 5.78B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.45 | 333% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.31 | 0.76 | 7,152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.41 | -10.88 | -509% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.87 | -23.99 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.59 | 37.35 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement