Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs FSPHX
FBTDX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTDX vs FSPHX
FBTDX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. FBTDX (1.26B). FBTDX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTDX (1.40) vs FSPHX (0.42). FBTDX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTDX (12 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTDX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBTDX: FSPHX (0) vs FBTDX (1000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.05 vs. FSPHX (14.59). FBTDX return over 5 years is better than : 32.98 vs. FSPHX (-10.56).
| FBTDX | FSPHX | FBTDX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.62 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.62 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.164 | 5.675 | 461% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 6.3B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.42 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.05 | 14.59 | 405% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.59 | 10.34 | 809% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.98 | -10.56 | -312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.40 | 46.08 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers