Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTTX vs FSPHX
FBTTX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTTX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTTX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. FBTTX (1.28B). FBTTX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTTX (3.15) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTTX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTTX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTTX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTTX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.35 vs. FSPHX (-12.67). FSPHX (-13.93) and FBTTX (-14.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBTTX | FSPHX | FBTTX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.63 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.63 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.960 | -7.266 | 54% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 5.86B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 0.02 | 17,416% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.35 | -12.67 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.79 | -1.50 | -1,915% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.11 | -13.93 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.25 | 8.04 | -140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement