Ad is loading...
FBTTX vs FSPHX
FBTTX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTTX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTTX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FBTTX (1.39B). FBTTX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTTX (3.07) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTTX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTTX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTTX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FBTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FBTTX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTTX (-10.72) and FSPHX (-10.80) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.01 vs. FBTTX (-13.61).
| FBTTX | FSPHX | FBTTX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.65 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.65 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.455 | -7.083 | 133% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 6.42B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 0.02 | 18,377% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.72 | -10.80 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.08 | -7.54 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.61 | -10.01 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.77 | 8.24 | -167% |