Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTTX vs FSPHX
FBTTX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts FBTTX vs FSPHX
FBTTX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTTX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTTX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.37B vs. FBTTX (2.2B). FBTTX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTTX (1.02) vs FSPHX (0.41). FBTTX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTTX (26 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTTX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FBTTX (51.00). FBTTX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.67 vs. FSPHX (8.45). FBTTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.57 vs. FSPHX (-17.88).
| FBTTX | FSPHX | FBTTX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.592 | -2.346 | -963% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 6.37B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.41 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.67 | 8.45 | 766% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.08 | -2.60 | -3,546% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.57 | -17.88 | -232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.64 | 37.79 | 322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement