FBYD
Price
$6.19
Change
-$0.45 (-6.78%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
300M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GPUS
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
26.24M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBYD vs GPUS

FBYD vs GPUS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBYD vs. GPUS commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBYD is a Hold and GPUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBYD($300M) has a higher market cap than GPUS($26.2M). FBYD has higher P/E ratio than GPUS: FBYD (55.56) vs GPUS (0.01). FBYD YTD gains are higher at: -58.761 vs. GPUS (-79.695). FBYD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.74M vs. GPUS (-54.88M). GPUS has more cash in the bank: 36.8M vs. FBYD (3.09M). FBYD has less debt than GPUS: FBYD (18.6M) vs GPUS (141M). GPUS has higher revenues than FBYD: GPUS (130M) vs FBYD (21.6M).
FBYDGPUSFBYD / GPUS
Capitalization300M26.2M1,145%
EBITDA-2.74M-54.88M5%
Gain YTD-58.761-79.69574%
P/E Ratio55.560.01436,620%
Revenue21.6M130M17%
Total Cash3.09M36.8M8%
Total Debt18.6M141M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPUS: Fundamental Ratings
GPUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBYDGPUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2026
Stock price -- (FBYD: $6.19 vs. GPUS: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: FBYD and GPUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBYD: 183% vs. GPUS: 91%
Market capitalization -- FBYD: $300M vs. GPUS: $26.24M
FBYD [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $300M. GPUS’s [@Industrial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $26.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $124.33K to $139.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBYD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while GPUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBYD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GPUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPUS is a better buy in the long-term than FBYD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBYD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBYD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GPUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPUS is a better buy in the short-term than FBYD.

Price Growth

FBYD (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -23.96% price change this week, while GPUS (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (-3.79% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

View a ticker or compare two or three
FBYD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GPUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVRDX14.60N/A
N/A
Connors Hedged Equity Institutional
PICMX37.53N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth I
USCAX16.48N/A
N/A
Victory Small Cap Stock
TWQIX19.81N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Cap Value I
THCVX33.97N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Value Idx I

FBYD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBYD and STRRP have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBYD and STRRP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBYD
1D Price
Change %
FBYD100%
-6.78%
STRRP - FBYD
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
TUSK - FBYD
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
GPUS - FBYD
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
BBUC - FBYD
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
RCMT - FBYD
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More

GPUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPUS has been loosely correlated with SPCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPUS jumps, then SPCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPUS
1D Price
Change %
GPUS100%
-0.32%
SPCX - GPUS
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
ACHR - GPUS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
EH - GPUS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
VOYG - GPUS
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
PRZO - GPUS
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
More