FC
Price
$20.66
Change
+$0.15 (+0.73%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
520.87M
82 days until earnings call
RGP
Price
$5.19
Change
-$0.13 (-2.44%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
440.97M
104 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FC vs RGP

Header iconFC vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts FC vs RGPBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$20.66
Change+$0.15 (+0.73%)
Volume$795
Capitalization520.87M
Resources Connection
Price$5.19
Change-$0.13 (-2.44%)
Volume$29.22K
Capitalization440.97M
FC vs RGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. RGP commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and RGP is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $20.51 vs. RGP: $5.32)
Brand notoriety: FC and RGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 485% vs. RGP: 314%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. RGP: $440.97M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. RGP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $440.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGP is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than RGP.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -27.01% price change this week, while RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -21.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.76% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than RGP($441M). FC has higher P/E ratio than RGP: FC (29.38) vs RGP (16.42). RGP YTD gains are higher at: -36.542 vs. FC (-45.423). RGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.1M vs. FC (35.9M). FC has less debt than RGP: FC (13.2M) vs RGP (16.5M). RGP has higher revenues than FC: RGP (705M) vs FC (280M).
FCRGPFC / RGP
Capitalization521M441M118%
EBITDA35.9M46.1M78%
Gain YTD-45.423-36.542124%
P/E Ratio29.3816.42179%
Revenue280M705M40%
Total Cash34MN/A-
Total Debt13.2M16.5M80%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
FC
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5156
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9513
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (71) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FC (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (38) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (94) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's Price Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FC (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCEQX84.86N/A
N/A
Green Century Equity Individual Investor
FDVLX13.10N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value
WPGTX18.12N/A
N/A
WPG Partners Small Cap Value Div Fund
PJRQX8.15N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq R6
SWMCX65.23N/A
N/A
Schwab ® US Mid-Cap Index

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
-19.76%
FC - RGP
59%
Loosely correlated
-26.46%
GHC - RGP
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.81%
EXPO - RGP
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.95%
BCO - RGP
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.05%
FORR - RGP
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.43%
More