FC
Price
$20.74
Change
+$0.42 (+2.07%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
520.87M
61 days until earnings call
RGP
Price
$5.51
Change
+$0.15 (+2.80%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
440.97M
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FC vs RGP

Header iconFC vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts FC vs RGPBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$20.74
Change+$0.42 (+2.07%)
Volume$101.28K
Capitalization520.87M
Resources Connection
Price$5.51
Change+$0.15 (+2.80%)
Volume$199.81K
Capitalization440.97M
FC vs RGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. RGP commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a StrongBuy and RGP is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $20.74 vs. RGP: $5.51)
Brand notoriety: FC and RGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 61% vs. RGP: 62%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. RGP: $440.97M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. RGP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $440.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGP is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FC and RGP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +1.82% price change this week, while RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +4.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +4.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+4.87% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than RGP($441M). FC has higher P/E ratio than RGP: FC (29.38) vs RGP (16.42). RGP YTD gains are higher at: -34.275 vs. FC (-44.811). RGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.1M vs. FC (35.9M). FC has less debt than RGP: FC (13.2M) vs RGP (16.5M). RGP has higher revenues than FC: RGP (705M) vs FC (280M).
FCRGPFC / RGP
Capitalization521M441M118%
EBITDA35.9M46.1M78%
Gain YTD-44.811-34.275131%
P/E Ratio29.3816.42179%
Revenue280M705M40%
Total Cash34MN/A-
Total Debt13.2M16.5M80%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
FC
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
3993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9390
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9513
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RGP (100) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (93) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's Price Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as FC (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QAACX42.07N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core A
RYGRX75.36N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth C
JCVIX22.35N/A
N/A
JHancock Classic Value I
AVUAX15.04N/A
N/A
American Century Mid Cap Value I
MSPRX19.34N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage C

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
+2.80%
FC - RGP
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
GHC - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
BCO - RGP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
CASS - RGP
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
EXPO - RGP
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More