Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCADX vs RERAX
FCADX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FCADX vs RERAX
FCADX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCADX vs. RERAX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCADX is a Buy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FCADX (6.98B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FCADX: RERAX (2.21) vs FCADX (1.90). FCADX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FCADX (22 years) vs RERAX (24 years). FCADX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RERAX (1.57). FCADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). FCADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FCADX (0) vs RERAX (250). FCADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.93 vs. RERAX (1.33). FCADX return over 5 years is better than : 12.34 vs. RERAX (-10.22).
| FCADX | RERAX | FCADX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.57 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.57 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.922 | 4.365 | 296% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.98B | 140B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 2.21 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.93 | 1.33 | 895% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.62 | 21.34 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.34 | -10.22 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.60 | 36.10 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers