Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCADX vs RERAX
FCADX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FCADX vs RERAX
FCADX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCADX vs. RERAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCADX is a StrongBuy and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FCADX (13B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FCADX: RERAX (2.19) vs FCADX (1.93). FCADX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FCADX (21 years) vs RERAX (24 years). FCADX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RERAX (1.57). FCADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RERAX (35.00). FCADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FCADX (0) vs RERAX (250). FCADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. RERAX (13.13). FCADX return over 5 years is better than : 14.21 vs. RERAX (-6.22).
| FCADX | RERAX | FCADX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.57 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.57 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.540 | 11.224 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 137B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 2.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | 13.13 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.93 | 27.83 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.21 | -6.22 | -228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.93 | 50.27 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers