Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCADX vs RERAX
FCADX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FCADX vs RERAX
FCADX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCADX vs. RERAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCADX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FCADX (13.2B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FCADX: RERAX (2.25) vs FCADX (1.90). FCADX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FCADX (22 years) vs RERAX (24 years). FCADX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RERAX (1.57). FCADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). FCADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FCADX (0) vs RERAX (250). FCADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.74 vs. RERAX (3.67). FCADX return over 5 years is better than : 16.44 vs. RERAX (-10.37).
| FCADX | RERAX | FCADX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.57 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.57 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.334 | 1.693 | 670% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 141B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 2.25 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.74 | 3.67 | 402% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.92 | 12.38 | 395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.44 | -10.37 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.15 | 36.08 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement