Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAGX vs NRGSX
FCAGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCAGX vs NRGSX
FCAGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAGX has more cash in the bank: 8.92B vs. NRGSX (6.95B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than FCAGX: NRGSX (0.44) vs FCAGX (0.00). FCAGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: FCAGX (22 years) vs NRGSX (14 years). FCAGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). FCAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). FCAGX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. NRGSX (-8.11). FCAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.27 vs. NRGSX (-23.14).
| FCAGX | NRGSX | FCAGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.74 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.74 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.855 | 11.425 | 165% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 6.95B | 128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | -8.11 | -191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.82 | 2.69 | 2,258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.27 | -23.14 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.10 | 10.53 | 970% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers