Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAGX vs WCMLX
FCAGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FCAGX vs WCMLX
FCAGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAGX has more cash in the bank: 8.92B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). FCAGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCAGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FCAGX (22 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FCAGX (1.17). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FCAGX (77.00). FCAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FCAGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). FCAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. WCMLX (2.81). FCAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.27 vs. WCMLX (-7.51).
| FCAGX | WCMLX | FCAGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.79 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.855 | 3.852 | 490% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 47.2M | 18,898% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 2.81 | 552% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.82 | 23.40 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.27 | -7.51 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement