Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAJX vs RNPEX
FCAJX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FCAJX vs RNPEX
FCAJX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCAJX (59.3M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FCAJX: RNPEX (0.94) vs FCAJX (0.00). FCAJX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FCAJX (5 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FCAJX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). FCAJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RNPEX (23.00). FCAJX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FCAJX (0) vs RNPEX (250). FCAJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.50 vs. RNPEX (7.34). FCAJX return over 5 years is better than : 63.48 vs. RNPEX (12.95).
| FCAJX | RNPEX | FCAJX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.75 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.569 | 5.321 | 255% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.50 | 7.34 | 429% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.66 | 34.13 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.48 | 12.95 | 490% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers