Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCALX vs RNPEX
FCALX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FCALX vs RNPEX
FCALX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. FCALX (58.1M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FCALX: RNPEX (0.95) vs FCALX (0.00). FCALX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FCALX (5 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FCALX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). FCALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RNPEX (23.00). FCALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FCALX (0) vs RNPEX (250). FCALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.34 vs. RNPEX (7.17). FCALX return over 5 years is better than : 52.92 vs. RNPEX (14.48).
| FCALX | RNPEX | FCALX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.75 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.75 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.754 | 7.273 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.1M | 166B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.34 | 7.17 | 381% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.73 | 43.47 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.92 | 14.48 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement