Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCALX vs RPEBX
FCALX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCALX vs RPEBX
FCALX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FCALX (58M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than FCALX: RPEBX (0.53) vs FCALX (0.00). FCALX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: FCALX (5 years) vs RPEBX (12 years). FCALX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.20). FCALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RPEBX (23.00). FCALX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPEBX: FCALX (0) vs RPEBX (250). FCALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.75 vs. RPEBX (13.26).
| FCALX | RPEBX | FCALX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.20 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.20 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.982 | 7.036 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.75 | 13.26 | 315% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.84 | 41.88 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.70 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers