Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAMX vs FCMAX
FCAMX vs FCMAX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FCMAX
FCAMX vs FCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FCMAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAMX has more cash in the bank: 3.28B vs. FCMAX (1.84B). FCAMX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: FCAMX (4.41) vs FCMAX (2.79). FCAMX was incepted earlier than FCMAX: FCAMX (33 years) vs FCMAX (24 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FCAMX (0.66). FCMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FCAMX (13.89). FCMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCAMX (4%) vs FCAMX (4%). FCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCAMX: FCMAX (0) vs FCAMX (1000). FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. FCMAX (2.78). FCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.78 vs. FCAMX (-3.10).
| FCAMX | FCMAX | FCAMX / FCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.76 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.76 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.281 | -1.105 | -25% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 94% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 1.84B | 178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 2.79 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.88 | 2.78 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.15 | 9.72 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.10 | 0.78 | -399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.84 | 13.73 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement