Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAMX vs FKTQX
FCAMX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FKTQX
FCAMX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FKTQX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. FCAMX (3.28B). FCAMX pays higher dividends than FKTQX: FCAMX (4.41) vs FKTQX (4.02). FCAMX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: FCAMX (33 years) vs FKTQX (9 years). FCAMX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). FCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.89 vs. FKTQX (11.93). FCAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: FCAMX (1000) vs FKTQX (1000000). FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. FKTQX (4.35). FKTQX return over 5 years is better than : -1.88 vs. FCAMX (-3.10).
| FCAMX | FKTQX | FCAMX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.48 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.48 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.281 | -0.059 | -480% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 12.8B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 4.02 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.88 | 4.35 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.15 | 11.30 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.10 | -1.88 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers