Ad is loading...
FCANX vs HBLAX
FCANX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FCANX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% C
Price$11.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.41
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94B
FCANX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCANX vs. HBLAX commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCANX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FCANX (2.01B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FCANX: HBLAX (3.33) vs FCANX (2.01). FCANX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FCANX (17 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). FCANX (1.54) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FCANX (22.00). FCANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FCANX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCANX: HBLAX (2000) vs FCANX (500). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. FCANX (3.83). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.00 vs. FCANX (20.85).
| FCANX | HBLAX | FCANX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.89 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.89 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.417 | 2.680 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 11.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 3.33 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 4.62 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.76 | 6.75 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.85 | 27.00 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.29 | 36.02 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers