Ad is loading...
FCANX vs HBLAX
FCANX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FCANX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% C
Price$11.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
FCANX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCANX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCANX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FCANX (1.95B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FCANX: HBLAX (3.37) vs FCANX (2.04). FCANX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FCANX (18 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). FCANX (1.54) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FCANX (22.00). FCANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FCANX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCANX: HBLAX (2000) vs FCANX (500). FCANX (4.50) and HBLAX (4.48) have marching annual gain over last year. HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.19 vs. FCANX (13.70).
| FCANX | HBLAX | FCANX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.89 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.89 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.075 | 0.100 | -1,076% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 11.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 3.37 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 4.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.74 | 3.18 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.70 | 15.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.45 | 29.63 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...