Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAOX vs FNPFX
FCAOX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FCAOX vs FNPFX
FCAOX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCAOX (59.3M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than FCAOX: FNPFX (1.23) vs FCAOX (0.00). FCAOX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: FCAOX (5 years) vs FNPFX (9 years). FCAOX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.40). FCAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FNPFX (23.00). FCAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: FCAOX (0) vs FNPFX (1000000). FCAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.11 vs. FNPFX (7.84). FCAOX return over 5 years is better than : 61.33 vs. FNPFX (14.99).
| FCAOX | FNPFX | FCAOX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.40 | 388% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.40 | 435% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.384 | 5.508 | 243% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.11 | 7.84 | 397% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.26 | 35.92 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.33 | 14.99 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement