FCAP
Price
$62.41
Change
-$0.19 (-0.30%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
208.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBNKO
Price
$25.58
Change
-$0.19 (-0.74%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs MBNKO

FCAP vs MBNKO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. MBNKO commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and MBNKO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FCAP: $62.41 vs. MBNKO: $25.58)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and MBNKO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 43% vs. MBNKO: 460%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $208.74M vs. MBNKO: $0
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $208.74M. MBNKO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBNKO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBNKO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCAP is a better buy in the long-term than MBNKO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBNKO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBNKO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBNKO is a better buy in the short-term than FCAP.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.26% price change this week, while MBNKO (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBNKO (6.680) and FCAP (6.638) have similar YTD gains . MBNKO has more cash in the bank: 39.9M vs. FCAP (21.7M). MBNKO has less debt than FCAP: MBNKO (3.9M) vs FCAP (33.6M). MBNKO has higher revenues than FCAP: MBNKO (238M) vs FCAP (52.7M).
FCAPMBNKOFCAP / MBNKO
Capitalization209MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.6386.68099%
P/E Ratio11.27N/A-
Revenue52.7M238M22%
Total Cash21.7M39.9M54%
Total Debt33.6M3.9M862%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCAPMBNKO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
6%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBNKO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMTL1.770.03
+2.02%
Comtech Telecommunications Corp
MGPI18.060.29
+1.63%
MGP Ingredients
AYI343.101.45
+0.42%
Acuity Inc
BPYPM16.550.07
+0.42%
Brookfield Property Partners LP
XPRO18.22-0.19
-1.03%
Expro Group Holdings NV

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCAP has been loosely correlated with NECB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCAP jumps, then NECB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-0.30%
NECB - FCAP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
SMBC - FCAP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
CZFS - FCAP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
HFWA - FCAP
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
TSBK - FCAP
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More

MBNKO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBNKO and FCAP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBNKO and FCAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBNKO
1D Price
Change %
MBNKO100%
-0.74%
FCAP - MBNKO
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
EFSI - MBNKO
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
GBCI - MBNKO
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PB - MBNKO
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
ONB - MBNKO
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More