Ad is loading...
FCASX vs RIDAX
FCASX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$27.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$25.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.21B
FCASX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a StrongBuy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FCASX (6.62B). RIDAX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDAX (3.13) vs FCASX (0.75). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.36). RIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FCASX (14.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDAX: FCASX (0) vs RIDAX (250). RIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. FCASX (2.61). RIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. FCASX (34.78).
| FCASX | RIDAX | FCASX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.771 | 4.708 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 128B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 3.13 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.61 | 8.84 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.89 | 13.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.78 | 37.26 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.54 | 31.24 | 120% |