Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDAX
FCASX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDAX
FCASX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Buy and RIDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FCASX (8.71B). RIDAX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDAX (2.72) vs FCASX (0.67). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: FCASX (18 years) vs RIDAX (24 years). FCASX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.34). RIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FCASX (29.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDAX: FCASX (0) vs RIDAX (250). FCASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. RIDAX (8.23). RIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.10 vs. FCASX (19.72).
| FCASX | RIDAX | FCASX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.34 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.34 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.887 | 7.840 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.71B | 145B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 2.72 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.52 | 8.23 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.69 | 31.83 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.72 | 21.10 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.81 | 50.73 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers