Ad is loading...
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$26.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.67B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$24.30
Change+$0.15 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.85B
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 124B vs. FCASX (6.67B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (3.16) vs FCASX (0.75). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.36). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FCASX (19.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. FCASX (0.54). RIDBX (32.40) and FCASX (31.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.440 | 1.613 | -275% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 124B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 3.16 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.54 | 9.12 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.02 | 4.78 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.52 | 32.40 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.86 | 26.67 | 112% |