Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$30.71
Change-$0.15 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.85
Change-$0.11 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.27B
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FCASX (7.3B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (2.94) vs FCASX (0.67). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.36). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FCASX (14.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX (8.98) and FCASX (8.81) have marching annual gain over last year. RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.36 vs. FCASX (36.33).
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.248 | 13.297 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.3B | 138B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 2.94 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 8.98 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.63 | 35.79 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.33 | 39.36 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.39 | 58.57 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement