Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$31.15
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$27.04
Change-$0.09 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.03B
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FCASX (7.54B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (2.90) vs FCASX (0.65). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.35). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FCASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.07 vs. RIDBX (8.34). RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. FCASX (31.60).
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.835 | 14.099 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.54B | 139B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 2.90 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.07 | 8.34 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.85 | 35.92 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.60 | 36.27 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.76 | 50.44 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement