Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$30.87
Change-$0.21 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.69B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.89
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.8B
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FCASX (7.69B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (2.92) vs FCASX (0.64). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.35). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FCASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.05 vs. RIDBX (9.01). RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 31.24 vs. FCASX (27.73).
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.055 | 13.466 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.69B | 138B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 2.92 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.05 | 9.01 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 25.50 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.73 | 31.24 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.59 | 47.81 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement