Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$29.83
Change+$0.11 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.15B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.7B
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FCASX (7.15B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (3.02) vs FCASX (0.69). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.36). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FCASX (14.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.34 vs. FCASX (12.38). RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.23 vs. FCASX (29.67).
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.064 | 10.581 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.15B | 135B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 3.02 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.38 | 13.34 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.67 | 20.88 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.67 | 33.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.33 | 41.98 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers