Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$29.39
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.11B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$26.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.4B
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FCASX (7.11B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (3.00) vs FCASX (0.69). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.36). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FCASX (14.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. FCASX (4.48). RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.87 vs. FCASX (31.30).
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.523 | 10.203 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.11B | 134B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 3.00 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 10.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 24.83 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.30 | 35.87 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.61 | 40.30 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement