Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% C
Price$28.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.85B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$25.85
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.88B
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a StrongBuy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FCASX (6.85B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (3.08) vs FCASX (0.72). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (17 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). FCASX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.36). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FCASX (14.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. FCASX (5.13). RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.30 vs. FCASX (30.19).
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.514 | 8.095 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.85B | 132B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 3.08 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.13 | 11.71 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.21 | 13.19 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.19 | 32.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.77 | 37.60 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers