Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDBX
FCASX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Hold and RIDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. FCASX (8.76B). RIDBX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDBX (2.80) vs FCASX (0.66). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: FCASX (18 years) vs RIDBX (24 years). FCASX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.35). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FCASX (29.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDBX: FCASX (0) vs RIDBX (250). FCASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. RIDBX (6.90). FCASX return over 5 years is better than : 23.19 vs. RIDBX (19.05).
| FCASX | RIDBX | FCASX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.35 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.451 | 5.324 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.76B | 147B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 2.80 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | 6.90 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.17 | 32.42 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.19 | 19.05 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.60 | 53.11 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement