Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDCX
FCASX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDCX
FCASX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a StrongBuy and RIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FCASX (8.89B). RIDCX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDCX (3.08) vs FCASX (0.66). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FCASX (18 years) vs RIDCX (24 years). FCASX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RIDCX (0.90). RIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FCASX (29.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FCASX (0) vs RIDCX (250). FCASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. RIDCX (4.60). RIDCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.20 vs. FCASX (19.18).
| FCASX | RIDCX | FCASX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.90 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.90 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.819 | 8.406 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.89B | 150B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 3.08 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.80 | 4.60 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.62 | 37.18 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.18 | 23.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.31 | 57.12 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers