Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDCX
FCASX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDCX
FCASX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Hold and RIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. FCASX (8.76B). RIDCX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDCX (3.16) vs FCASX (0.66). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FCASX (18 years) vs RIDCX (24 years). FCASX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RIDCX (0.90). RIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FCASX (29.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FCASX (0) vs RIDCX (250). FCASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. RIDCX (7.48). FCASX return over 5 years is better than : 23.19 vs. RIDCX (21.52).
| FCASX | RIDCX | FCASX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.90 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.90 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.451 | 5.525 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.76B | 147B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 3.16 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | 7.48 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.17 | 34.32 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.19 | 21.52 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.60 | 57.63 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers