Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCASX vs RIDCX
FCASX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FCASX vs RIDCX
FCASX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCASX vs. RIDCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCASX is a Buy and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FCASX (8.83B). RIDCX pays higher dividends than FCASX: RIDCX (3.18) vs FCASX (0.66). FCASX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FCASX (18 years) vs RIDCX (24 years). FCASX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RIDCX (0.90). RIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FCASX (29.00). FCASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FCASX (0) vs RIDCX (250). FCASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. RIDCX (6.46). RIDCX (21.77) and FCASX (21.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCASX | RIDCX | FCASX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.90 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.90 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.085 | 6.732 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.83B | 145B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 3.18 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.33 | 6.46 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.92 | 32.65 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.49 | 21.77 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.11 | 51.83 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers