Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBAX vs MFBHX
FCBAX vs MFBHX Comparison
Open Charts FCBAX vs MFBHX
FCBAX vs MFBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBAX vs. MFBHX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBAX is a Hold and MFBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFBHX has more cash in the bank: 4.36B vs. FCBAX (1.92B). MFBHX pays higher dividends than FCBAX: MFBHX (4.59) vs FCBAX (4.05). FCBAX was incepted earlier than MFBHX: FCBAX (16 years) vs MFBHX (21 years). FCBAX (0.77) and MFBHX (0.77) have similar cost to investors . FCBAX (43.00) and MFBHX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCBAX (0) and MFBHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.72 vs. FCBAX (1.49). FCBAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.77 vs. MFBHX (-5.02).
| FCBAX | MFBHX | FCBAX / MFBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.76 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.972 | -0.759 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 4.36B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.49 | 1.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.21 | 15.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.77 | -5.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.35 | 20.26 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement