Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBAX vs PGCAX
FCBAX vs PGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCBAX vs PGCAX
FCBAX vs PGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBAX vs. PGCAX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBAX is a Hold and PGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGCAX has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. FCBAX (1.92B). PGCAX pays higher dividends than FCBAX: PGCAX (4.78) vs FCBAX (4.05). FCBAX was incepted earlier than PGCAX: FCBAX (16 years) vs PGCAX (24 years). PGCAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FCBAX (0.77). PGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 209.00 vs. FCBAX (43.00). FCBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGCAX: FCBAX (0) vs PGCAX (1000000). PGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.12 vs. FCBAX (1.49). PGCAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.19 vs. FCBAX (-3.77).
| FCBAX | PGCAX | FCBAX / PGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.972 | -0.774 | 126% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 13.1B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.78 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.49 | 2.12 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.21 | 16.24 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.77 | -2.19 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.35 | 23.26 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement