Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCCNX vs TREMX
FCCNX vs TREMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCNX vs TREMX
FCCNX vs TREMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCNX vs. TREMX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCNX is a StrongBuy and TREMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCNX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. TREMX (70.3M). TREMX pays higher dividends than FCCNX: TREMX (1.91) vs FCCNX (0.00). FCCNX was incepted earlier than TREMX: FCCNX (19 years) vs TREMX (26 years). TREMX (2.84) is less costly to investors than FCCNX (1.89). FCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. TREMX (5.40). FCCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TREMX: FCCNX (0) vs TREMX (2500). TREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.85 vs. FCCNX (18.29). FCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 43.58 vs. TREMX (-36.94).
| FCCNX | TREMX | FCCNX / TREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.41 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.84 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.415 | 34.094 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 70.3M | 1,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.29 | 50.85 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.60 | 159.56 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.58 | -36.94 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.21 | -6.69 | -1,258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers