Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCCNX vs TREMX
FCCNX vs TREMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCNX vs TREMX
FCCNX vs TREMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCNX vs. TREMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCNX is a Hold and TREMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCNX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. TREMX (70.6M). TREMX pays higher dividends than FCCNX: TREMX (1.83) vs FCCNX (0.00). FCCNX was incepted earlier than TREMX: FCCNX (19 years) vs TREMX (26 years). TREMX (2.84) is less costly to investors than FCCNX (1.89). FCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. TREMX (5.40). FCCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TREMX: FCCNX (0) vs TREMX (2500). TREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.99 vs. FCCNX (10.46). FCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.58 vs. TREMX (-39.47).
| FCCNX | TREMX | FCCNX / TREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.41 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.84 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.818 | 35.302 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 70.6M | 1,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 58.99 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.49 | 165.20 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.58 | -39.47 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.31 | -6.15 | -1,403% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers