Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCCQX vs SRCMX
FCCQX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCQX vs SRCMX
FCCQX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCQX vs. SRCMX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCQX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCQX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. SRCMX (675M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: SRCMX (3.56) vs FCCQX (3.37). FCCQX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FCCQX (8 years) vs SRCMX (37 years). SRCMX (0.85) and FCCQX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.20 vs. FCCQX (22.85). SRCMX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCCQX (2%) vs FCCQX (2%). FCCQX (1000) and SRCMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SRCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. FCCQX (3.97). FCCQX return over 5 years is better than : 0.35 vs. SRCMX (-2.43).
| FCCQX | SRCMX | FCCQX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.85 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.384 | 0.399 | 96% |
| Front Load | 2% | 4% | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 675M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.56 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.97 | 4.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.20 | 10.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.35 | -2.43 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement