Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCCQX vs SRCMX
FCCQX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCQX vs SRCMX
FCCQX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCQX vs. SRCMX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCQX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCQX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. SRCMX (655M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: SRCMX (3.55) vs FCCQX (3.35). FCCQX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FCCQX (8 years) vs SRCMX (37 years). SRCMX (0.85) and FCCQX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.20 vs. FCCQX (10.23). SRCMX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCCQX (2%) vs FCCQX (2%). FCCQX (1000) and SRCMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.02 vs. SRCMX (-0.36). FCCQX return over 5 years is better than : -1.25 vs. SRCMX (-4.49).
| FCCQX | SRCMX | FCCQX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.85 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.85 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.295 | -1.813 | 71% |
| Front Load | 2% | 4% | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 655M | 213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 3.55 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.02 | -0.36 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.30 | 8.21 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.25 | -4.49 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement