Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCCRX vs SRCMX
FCCRX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCRX vs SRCMX
FCCRX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCRX vs. SRCMX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCRX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCRX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. SRCMX (683M). FCCRX (3.55) and SRCMX (3.48) have matching dividends . FCCRX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FCCRX (9 years) vs SRCMX (37 years). SRCMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FCCRX (0.51). SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.20 vs. FCCRX (22.85). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCCRX: SRCMX (1000) vs FCCRX (1000000). SRCMX (6.06) and FCCRX (5.85) have marching annual gain over last year. FCCRX return over 5 years is better than : 2.47 vs. SRCMX (-0.96).
| FCCRX | SRCMX | FCCRX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.85 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.85 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.301 | 1.440 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 683M | 207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 3.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 6.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.07 | 11.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.47 | -0.96 | -257% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers