Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCDAX vs NAESX
FCDAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FCDAX vs NAESX
FCDAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCDAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCDAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. FCDAX (7.54B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FCDAX: NAESX (1.07) vs FCDAX (0.04). FCDAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FCDAX (19 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FCDAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FCDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FCDAX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.77 vs. NAESX (20.51). FCDAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. NAESX (34.06).
| FCDAX | NAESX | FCDAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.17 | 665% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.17 | 665% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.631 | 13.801 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.54B | 189B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.07 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.77 | 20.51 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.75 | 41.82 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.46 | 34.06 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.20 | 150.35 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers