Ad is loading...
FCDCX vs NAESX
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FCDCX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp C
Price$28.37
Change+$0.49 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.6B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCDCX vs. NAESX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCDCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FCDCX (4.6B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FCDCX: NAESX (1.43) vs FCDCX (0.37). FCDCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FCDCX (18 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FCDCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FCDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FCDCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. FCDCX (-6.40). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. FCDCX (50.69).
| FCDCX | NAESX | FCDCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.17 | 1,135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.17 | 1,135% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.215 | -8.414 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.6B | 140B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.43 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.40 | -0.09 | 7,021% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.24 | 20.27 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.69 | 65.08 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | 87.81 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...