Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCDCX vs NAESX
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FCDCX vs NAESX
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCDCX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCDCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FCDCX (7.38B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FCDCX: NAESX (1.10) vs FCDCX (0.00). FCDCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FCDCX (19 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FCDCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FCDCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.12 vs. NAESX (24.75). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. FCDCX (39.72).
| FCDCX | NAESX | FCDCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.925 | 18.339 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.38B | 183B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.12 | 24.75 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.31 | 58.17 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.72 | 42.07 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.25 | 156.41 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement