Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCDCX vs NAESX
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FCDCX vs NAESX
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCDCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCDCX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. FCDCX (7.54B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FCDCX: NAESX (1.07) vs FCDCX (0.00). FCDCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FCDCX (19 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FCDCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FCDCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.87 vs. NAESX (23.34). FCDCX (40.31) and NAESX (38.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCDCX | NAESX | FCDCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.740 | 15.738 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.54B | 189B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.87 | 23.34 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.81 | 48.12 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 38.39 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.62 | 157.36 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers