Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCDCX vs NAESX
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FCDCX vs NAESX
FCDCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCDCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCDCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FCDCX (7.04B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FCDCX: NAESX (1.08) vs FCDCX (0.00). FCDCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FCDCX (19 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FCDCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FCDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FCDCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.07 vs. NAESX (27.66). FCDCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.94 vs. NAESX (33.59).
| FCDCX | NAESX | FCDCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.104 | 15.348 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.04B | 183B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.07 | 27.66 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.03 | 57.38 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.94 | 33.59 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.67 | 172.93 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement