Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCDTX vs NAESX
FCDTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FCDTX vs NAESX
FCDTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCDTX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCDTX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FCDTX (7.04B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FCDTX: NAESX (1.08) vs FCDTX (0.00). FCDTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FCDTX (19 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FCDTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FCDTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FCDTX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.82 vs. NAESX (27.66). FCDTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.54 vs. NAESX (33.59).
| FCDTX | NAESX | FCDTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.17 | 818% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.17 | 818% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.365 | 15.348 | 126% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.04B | 183B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.82 | 27.66 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.00 | 57.38 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.54 | 33.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.84 | 172.93 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement