Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCDTX vs NAESX
FCDTX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FCDTX vs NAESX
FCDTX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCDTX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCDTX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FCDTX (7.38B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FCDTX: NAESX (1.10) vs FCDTX (0.00). FCDTX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FCDTX (19 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FCDTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FCDTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FCDTX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.32 vs. NAESX (27.81). FCDTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.96 vs. NAESX (38.18).
| FCDTX | NAESX | FCDTX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.17 | 818% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.17 | 818% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.109 | 18.436 | 125% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.38B | 183B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.32 | 27.81 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.73 | 52.59 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.96 | 38.18 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.61 | 159.57 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement