Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFRX vs PFFRX
FCFRX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFRX vs. PFFRX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFRX is a StrongBuy and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. FCFRX (1.46B). FCFRX (7.56) and PFFRX (7.35) have matching dividends . FCFRX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: FCFRX (24 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). FCFRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. FCFRX (51.91). FCFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: FCFRX (1000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. FCFRX (6.45). FCFRX return over 5 years is better than : 39.70 vs. PFFRX (37.11).
| FCFRX | PFFRX | FCFRX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.69 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.69 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.787 | 4.460 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 4.98B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.56 | 7.35 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 7.53 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | 29.04 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.70 | 37.11 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.35 | 63.01 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement