Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFRX vs PFFRX
FCFRX vs PFFRX Comparison
Open Charts FCFRX vs PFFRX
FCFRX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFRX vs. PFFRX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFRX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.74B vs. FCFRX (1.17B). FCFRX (7.20) and PFFRX (6.86) have matching dividends . FCFRX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: FCFRX (25 years) vs PFFRX (16 years). FCFRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. FCFRX (46.13). FCFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: FCFRX (1000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.24 vs. FCFRX (2.38). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.45 vs. FCFRX (29.88).
| FCFRX | PFFRX | FCFRX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.69 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.69 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.483 | 0.990 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 4.74B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.20 | 6.86 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 5.24 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 26.21 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.88 | 33.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.32 | 64.56 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers