Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFRX vs TRIZX
FCFRX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.36B vs. FCFRX (1.46B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than FCFRX: TRIZX (8.00) vs FCFRX (7.56). FCFRX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: FCFRX (24 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). FCFRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FCFRX (51.91). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCFRX: TRIZX (0) vs FCFRX (1000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. FCFRX (6.45). TRIZX (41.65) and FCFRX (39.70) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCFRX | TRIZX | FCFRX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.02 | 6,750% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.61 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.787 | 4.913 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 4.36B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.56 | 8.00 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 8.23 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.99 | 31.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.70 | 41.65 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers