Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFRX vs TRIZX
FCFRX vs TRIZX Comparison
Open Charts FCFRX vs TRIZX
FCFRX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFRX vs. TRIZX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFRX is a Hold and TRIZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.05B vs. FCFRX (1.17B). TRIZX (7.57) and FCFRX (7.20) have matching dividends . FCFRX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: FCFRX (25 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). FCFRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.90 vs. FCFRX (46.13). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCFRX: TRIZX (0) vs FCFRX (1000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. FCFRX (2.38). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 38.05 vs. FCFRX (29.88).
| FCFRX | TRIZX | FCFRX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.02 | 6,750% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.61 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.483 | 1.152 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 4.05B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.20 | 7.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 5.96 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 28.51 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.88 | 38.05 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers