Advertisement
FCFS vs LMFA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a Hold and LMFA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLMFA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FCFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LMFA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMFA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FCFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LMFA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FCFS (@Savings Banks) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while LMFA (@Savings Banks) price change was -25.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-3.51% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| FCFS | LMFA | FCFS / LMFA | |
| Capitalization | 6.91B | 9.73M | 71,013% |
| EBITDA | 975M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 52.952 | -61.749 | -86% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.48 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.49B | 12.5M | 27,888% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 827K | - |
| Total Debt | 2.02B | 7.36M | 27,494% |
FCFS | LMFA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMFA's Valuation (13) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCFS (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that LMFA’s stock grew significantly faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
FCFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMFA (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew significantly faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
FCFS's SMR Rating (85) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LMFA (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
FCFS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMFA (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
FCFS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMFA (90) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMFA’s over the last 12 months.
| FCFS | LMFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 67% | 27 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
FCFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with EZPW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then EZPW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFS | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| EZPW - FCFS | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| UPBD - FCFS | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| BBDC - FCFS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| R - FCFS | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LMFA - FCFS | 30% Poorly correlated | -8.80% | ||
More | ||||
LMFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LMFA and FCFS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMFA and FCFS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMFA | 100% | -8.80% | ||
| FCFS - LMFA | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| GATX - LMFA | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SOFI - LMFA | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| ENVA - LMFA | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
| QFIN - LMFA | 27% Poorly correlated | -14.14% | ||
More | ||||