Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCFY vs RECS
First Trust S&P 500 Div Fr CA Flw ETF
Price$26.86
Change-$0.46 (-1.68%)
Volume$127
Net Assets1.35M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.51
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Volume$1.46M
Net Assets3.95B
FCFY vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFY vs. RECS commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFY is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.95B vs. FCFY (1.35M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCFY: RECS (17.013) vs FCFY (10.920). FCFY was incepted earlier than RECS: FCFY (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCFY (0.60). FCFY has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCFY | RECS | FCFY / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.920 | 17.013 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 1.35M | 3.95B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 49.00 | 129% |
| Yield | 1.70 | 0.60 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCFY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCFY and CAH have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCFY and CAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CAH - FCFY | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
| CAT - FCFY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
| NDSN - FCFY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| MAS - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| PHM - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||