Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCFY vs RECS
First Trust S&P 500 Div Fr CA Flw ETF
Price$24.97
Change-$0.14 (-0.56%)
Volume$209
Net Assets1.26M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.24
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
Volume$414
Net Assets3.27B
FCFY vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFY vs. RECS commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFY is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.27B vs. FCFY (1.26M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCFY: RECS (9.879) vs FCFY (2.744). FCFY was incepted earlier than RECS: FCFY (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCFY (0.60). FCFY has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCFY | RECS | FCFY / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.744 | 9.879 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 1.26M | 3.27B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 49.00 | 129% |
| Yield | 1.77 | 0.64 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCFY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 8 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFY has been loosely correlated with CAH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFY jumps, then CAH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFY | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| CAH - FCFY | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| CAT - FCFY | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| NDSN - FCFY | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| MAS - FCFY | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| PHM - FCFY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
More | ||||