Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFY vs. RECS commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFY is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 6.04B vs. FCFY (1.52M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCFY: RECS (10.798) vs FCFY (7.332). FCFY was incepted earlier than RECS: FCFY (3 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCFY (0.60). FCFY has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| FCFY | RECS | FCFY / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.332 | 10.798 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 1.52M | 6.04B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 78.00 | 32.00 | 244% |
| Yield | 1.41 | 0.74 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCFY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDXU | 158.63 | 34.46 | +27.75% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN | |||
| KDEF | 44.30 | 1.59 | +3.72% |
| Plus Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | |||
| RSPD | 57.62 | 0.76 | +1.34% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Cnsm Disc ETF | |||
| GDOC | 37.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Eq ETF | |||
| XBJA | 34.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jan | |||
FCFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFY has been loosely correlated with HPQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFY jumps, then HPQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFY | 100% | N/A | ||
| HPQ - FCFY | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PAYX - FCFY | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| CTSH - FCFY | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.45% | ||
| GEN - FCFY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| EPAM - FCFY | 26% Poorly correlated | +7.10% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
More | ||||