Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFY vs. RECS commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFY is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.82B vs. FCFY (1.39M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCFY: RECS (6.685) vs FCFY (-0.527). FCFY was incepted earlier than RECS: FCFY (3 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCFY (0.60). FCFY has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| FCFY | RECS | FCFY / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -0.527 | 6.685 | -8% |
| Net Assets | 1.39M | 5.82B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 78.00 | 32.00 | 244% |
| Yield | 1.50 | 0.75 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCFY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFY has been loosely correlated with HPQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFY jumps, then HPQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFY | 100% | N/A | ||
| HPQ - FCFY | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.57% | ||
| PAYX - FCFY | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GEN - FCFY | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EPAM - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.98% | ||
| STT - FCFY | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
More | ||||