Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGAX vs RGACX
FCGAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCGAX vs RGACX
FCGAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FCGAX (17.9B). FCGAX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCGAX (0.19) vs RGACX (0.00). FCGAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCGAX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FCGAX (0.52). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCGAX (8.28). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGAX: RGACX (250) vs FCGAX (100000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. FCGAX (6.28). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 22.53 vs. FCGAX (2.84).
| FCGAX | RGACX | FCGAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.510 | 10.291 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 338B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | 14.24 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.91 | 51.07 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.84 | 22.53 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.45 | 107.79 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement