Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGAX vs RGACX
FCGAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCGAX vs RGACX
FCGAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FCGAX (17.4B). FCGAX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCGAX (0.19) vs RGACX (0.00). FCGAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCGAX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FCGAX (0.52). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FCGAX (8.28). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGAX: RGACX (250) vs FCGAX (100000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. FCGAX (4.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. FCGAX (-2.76).
| FCGAX | RGACX | FCGAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.969 | 6.185 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 7.94 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.91 | 43.05 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.76 | 13.23 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.30 | 107.97 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement