Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGBX vs FWCBX
FCGBX vs FWCBX Comparison
Open Charts FCGBX vs FWCBX
FCGBX vs FWCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGBX vs. FWCBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGBX is a Hold and FWCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FCGBX (340M). FCGBX pays higher dividends than FWCBX: FCGBX (4.85) vs FWCBX (2.91). FCGBX was incepted earlier than FWCBX: FCGBX (15 years) vs FWCBX (6 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FCGBX (50.24) and FWCBX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: FWCBX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.78 vs. FWCBX (7.87). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.51 vs. FCGBX (32.69).
| FCGBX | FWCBX | FCGBX / FWCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.31 | 632% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.31 | 648% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.365 | 9.823 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.85 | 2.91 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.78 | 7.87 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.36 | 45.51 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 44.51 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement