Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGBX vs RCEEX
FCGBX vs RCEEX Comparison
Open Charts FCGBX vs RCEEX
FCGBX vs RCEEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGBX vs. RCEEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGBX is a Hold and RCEEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. FCGBX (346M). FCGBX pays higher dividends than RCEEX: FCGBX (4.58) vs RCEEX (2.25). FCGBX was incepted earlier than RCEEX: FCGBX (15 years) vs RCEEX (12 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RCEEX (1.06). FCGBX (50.24) and RCEEX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: RCEEX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.33 vs. RCEEX (11.28). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. FCGBX (36.66).
| FCGBX | RCEEX | FCGBX / RCEEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.06 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.06 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.728 | 11.192 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 130B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.58 | 2.25 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.33 | 11.28 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.88 | 45.96 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.66 | 38.93 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.38 | 64.77 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers