Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGBX vs RCEEX
FCGBX vs RCEEX Comparison
Open Charts FCGBX vs RCEEX
FCGBX vs RCEEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGBX vs. RCEEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGBX is a Hold and RCEEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FCGBX (340M). FCGBX pays higher dividends than RCEEX: FCGBX (4.85) vs RCEEX (2.24). FCGBX was incepted earlier than RCEEX: FCGBX (15 years) vs RCEEX (12 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RCEEX (1.06). FCGBX (50.24) and RCEEX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: RCEEX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.78 vs. RCEEX (7.06). RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.20 vs. FCGBX (32.69).
| FCGBX | RCEEX | FCGBX / RCEEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.06 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.06 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.365 | 9.278 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.85 | 2.24 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.78 | 7.06 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.36 | 42.27 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 36.20 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.22 | 65.49 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement