Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGBX vs RIRBX
FCGBX vs RIRBX Comparison
Open Charts FCGBX vs RIRBX
FCGBX vs RIRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGBX vs. RIRBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGBX is a Hold and RIRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FCGBX (340M). FCGBX pays higher dividends than RIRBX: FCGBX (4.85) vs RIRBX (1.96). FCGBX was incepted earlier than RIRBX: FCGBX (15 years) vs RIRBX (24 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RIRBX (1.35). FCGBX (50.24) and RIRBX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. RIRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: RIRBX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.78 vs. RIRBX (6.78). RIRBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.62 vs. FCGBX (32.69).
| FCGBX | RIRBX | FCGBX / RIRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.35 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.35 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.365 | 9.054 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.85 | 1.96 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.78 | 6.78 | 306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.36 | 41.10 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 34.62 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.22 | 63.19 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement