Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGCX vs FRNRX
FCGCX vs FRNRX Comparison
Open Charts FCGCX vs FRNRX
FCGCX vs FRNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGCX vs. FRNRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGCX is a Hold and FRNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGCX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. FRNRX (510M). FRNRX pays higher dividends than FCGCX: FRNRX (1.38) vs FCGCX (1.22). FCGCX was incepted earlier than FRNRX: FCGCX (17 years) vs FRNRX (31 years). FCGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). FCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FCGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRNRX: FCGCX (0) vs FRNRX (1000). FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.35 vs. FCGCX (34.09). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 113.80 vs. FCGCX (74.39).
| FCGCX | FRNRX | FCGCX / FRNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.00 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.01 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.056 | 17.985 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 510M | 287% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.38 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.09 | 42.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.12 | 70.65 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.39 | 113.80 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.57 | 94.80 | 194% |