Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGCX vs PGNAX
FCGCX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FCGCX vs PGNAX
FCGCX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGCX vs. PGNAX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGCX is a Hold and PGNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGCX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. PGNAX (916M). FCGCX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: FCGCX (1.33) vs PGNAX (0.85). FCGCX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: FCGCX (17 years) vs PGNAX (37 years). FCGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PGNAX (1.26). FCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PGNAX (57.00). FCGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGNAX: FCGCX (0) vs PGNAX (1000). PGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.13 vs. FCGCX (37.28). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 111.62 vs. FCGCX (89.93).
| FCGCX | PGNAX | FCGCX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.26 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.26 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.980 | 15.444 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 916M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.85 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.28 | 42.13 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.77 | 51.25 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.93 | 111.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.68 | 161.22 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers