Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGCX vs PGNAX
FCGCX vs PGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FCGCX vs PGNAX
FCGCX vs PGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGCX vs. PGNAX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGCX is a Hold and PGNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGCX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PGNAX (981M). FCGCX pays higher dividends than PGNAX: FCGCX (1.15) vs PGNAX (0.76). FCGCX was incepted earlier than PGNAX: FCGCX (17 years) vs PGNAX (37 years). FCGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PGNAX (1.26). FCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PGNAX (57.00). FCGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGNAX: FCGCX (0) vs PGNAX (1000). PGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.37 vs. FCGCX (42.28). PGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 127.85 vs. FCGCX (105.34).
| FCGCX | PGNAX | FCGCX / PGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.26 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.26 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.200 | 26.103 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 981M | 161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.76 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 45.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.85 | 64.83 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.34 | 127.85 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 206.58 | 185.17 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers