Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGIX vs NPFCX
FCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FCGIX vs NPFCX
FCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGIX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGIX (44M). FCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FCGIX (0.52) vs NPFCX (0.33). FCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FCGIX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FCGIX (1.37). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). FCGIX (6.47) and NPFCX (6.26) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 13.12 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| FCGIX | NPFCX | FCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.47 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.47 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.667 | 4.931 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.33 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.47 | 6.26 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.92 | 30.32 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.12 | 8.52 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement