Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGMX vs RNPAX
FCGMX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCGMX vs RNPAX
FCGMX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCGMX (43.8M). FCGMX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: FCGMX (0.48) vs RNPAX (0.36). FCGMX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: FCGMX (3 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FCGMX (1.35). FCGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). FCGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPAX: FCGMX (0) vs RNPAX (250). RNPAX (11.98) and FCGMX (11.53) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FCGMX | RNPAX | FCGMX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.49 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.49 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.661 | 6.070 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.8M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.36 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 11.98 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 37.06 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 10.66 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 109.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement